We use cookies on this site to enhance your experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

How do I present data in an academic article?

One of the most important decisions you will make when writing an academic paper is how to present your data; that is, which data should be placed in tables, which data is best shown in figures, and how to make both of these display items as clear and as easy to interpret as possible. Presenting data in figures and tables instead of describing it in the text enables you to quickly and easily convey large amounts of complex information, and enhance and even accelerate reader understanding of your paper.

 

When deciding between whether to present data in a table or figure, it is helpful to consider what type of data you have and what message you are trying to convey. Generally speaking, tables are best suited to presenting specific numerical values, whereas figures are best for showing summaries, trends, and comparisons.

 

What important aspects of presenting data in figures and tables should I know?

So how do you present your data as clearly as possible in your paper’s figures and tables? There are a few important principles that can help you easily achieve this goal:

 

  • Simplicity. The goal of a display element is to give readers a way to quickly and easily understand the most important aspect(s) of your findings, so simplicity is the key to making sure this message gets across clearly. For both figures and tables, this can be achieved by striving for a simple, visually appealing presentation that focuses primarily on the data (e.g. values, trendlines) and eliminates any unnecessary elements (e.g. horizontal lines on graphs, data labels, etc.).
  • Consistency. Closely related to the concept of simplicity is that of consistency, which applies to how data are presented in a series of figures or tables within the same paper. Essentially, each display item should be formatted in a similar way to make them easy to understand together, and avoid requiring readers to decode a new colour scheme or presentation style for each display item. For example, if the same set of experimental groups appears in more than one table, these groups should always be listed in the same order, to facilitate inter-table comparison.
  • Completeness. Finally, each figure or table should, ideally, be fully understandable without needing to refer to the main text. This means, for example, that figure legends should describe the experimental methods that were used to generate the data shown in that figure and all symbols should be clearly defined. Table footnotes can be used to define acronyms or abbreviations if they are not written out in full in the table itself.  

 

Adhering to these principles will help readers quickly and easily grasp the most important points from each figure and understand how they fit into the paper as a whole.

 

How do I integrate figures and tables into my paper?

While figures and tables should ideally be fully interpretable on their own, as mentioned above, in a well-written paper they will also integrate seamlessly into the main text to tell a cohesive story. To help incorporate figures and tables naturally into the text of the paper, we recommend keeping the following points in mind:

 

  • Make sure to cite each table and figure in the main text. Generally speaking, the display element should be cited directly after the relevant finding is described in the text, e.g. ‘Overall, 70% of patients showed significant improvement two weeks post-surgery (Fig. 3A).’
  • Do not repeat information in both the text and a display item; figures and tables should complement, but not repeat, the text. For example, the text can state that “the value for group A was significantly higher than that for group B”, then cite a table to direct readers’ attention to the actual values (e.g. group A = 7.2, group B = 3.5, p-value < 0.5).
  • Similarly, avoid showing data in both a table and a figure, as this can confuse readers by making the findings more difficult to interpret. If the overall trend or summary is the most important conclusion that you wish to highlight, a figure is probably best; whereas if you primarily wish to show or compare specific values, a table is probably a better choice.
  • Ideally, each figure or table should correspond to a single subsection with the Results section. This makes it easier for readers to find the data that support a claim made in the text, and provides a clear and logical structure for the article as a whole.
  • Consider using declarative figure and table titles to help readers quickly grasp the most important conclusion drawn from the data shown in that figure or table. A declarative title is written in present tense and states a conclusion, instead of a description. For example, instead of titling a figure ‘Investigating the effects of compound A on reaction X’, try something like ‘Compound A increases the rate of reaction X.’ Often this figure title will be very similar to the title of the corresponding subsection of the Results, which will help reinforce the overall structure of the paper.

 

When not to present data in a table or figure

Data that do not directly support the main points being made in the paper can sometimes be placed in the Supplementary Information section, or in an Appendix, to avoid distracting readers’ attention from the paper’s main message. For example, if an experiment was repeated in a closely related cell line that showed the same results, the data from the first cell line could be shown in a main figure, and the very similar data from the second cell line should be shown in a supplementary figure. Be sure to check your target journal’s guidelines first to ensure that this is an option.

 

It is sometimes acceptable to use the phrase ‘data not shown’ to describe data that were generated as part of the study that do not warrant being shown even in a supplementary figure or table. For example, if five bacterial strains were screened for expression of a particular protein, and only one expressed the protein, it would not be useful to show empty (negative) Western blots or microscopy images with no fluorescent signals for the other four strains. In this case, not showing the data would be appropriate, so that the main figures and tables are used more effectively to show positive data.

 

We also recommend checking your target journal’s guidelines carefully when considering how to present data in figures and graphs, as many journals limit the number of display items that can be included in a single paper. Often, separate figures can be combined into a single, multi-part figure to help address this, as long as all of the parts of the figure are relevant to the same overarching point (e.g. they tell the same story).

 

Conclusion

Charlesworth Author Services provide expert English language editing and publication support services including Statistical Review services for medical and life sciences. Why not get in touch with a member of our Charlesworth Author Services team for more information.

 

Our academic writing and publishing training courses, online materials, and blog articles contain numerous tips and tricks to help you navigate academic writing and publishing, and maximise your potential as a researcher. You can find out more about our free author training webinar series by clicking here

 

Maximise your publication success with Charlesworth Author Services.

Share with your colleagues