We use cookies on this site to enhance your experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

Navigating peer review: How to respond to comments you disagree with in order to maximise your chances of acceptance

Navigating peer review: How to respond to comments you disagree with in order to maximise your chances of acceptance

Your peer reviewers are human. Your peer reviewers are academic researcher colleagues. Your peer reviewers might be from a competing research group. It’s sadly the case that most people, when asked to evaluate someone else’s work, start from the perspective of how can I find the issues and the problems with this article’ rather than ‘what’s good about this work?’ or ‘how can I help these authors to get their work published?’. You can train yourself, when performing peer review, to adopt the latter, more positive perspective.

Positive peer review, learning to evaluate the work of others in a constructive manner, is a key transferrable skill. Your colleagues and co-workers will appreciate you very much if you are able to do this: our peer review training, online materials, and recordings of previous webinars can help. Why not get in touch with Charlesworth Author Services for more information?

It is important to keep the likely negativity of others in mind when writing your research articles: it’s human nature for peer reviewers to approach their task with a negative mindset. Charlesworth editing and language polishing services can help you navigate this, however: our Premium Service includes ‘pre-peer review’ where a native English speaking PhD-level specialist working in your research field will edit and evaluate your article to pre-empt the kinds of comments likely to be raised during live peer review. Our service can help you to ‘bullet proof’ your articles before making initial submissions to journals, and thereby increase their chances of eventual acceptance. Find out more about our Premium Service

If you get peer review comments back on your work that you disagree with, stay calm. The most important thing is to remain polite and constructive in your responses, even if a peer reviewer has been outright rude (it happens) or is simply incorrect in their assertions or conclusions about your work (it happens). It’s also highly likely that your editor has noticed these negative comments as well as the tone of the reviewer and is now waiting to see how you will respond. If you respond aggressively to the editor, you will decrease your chances of acceptance: take negative comments on the chin and learn to compose clear, unambiguous, strong, and polite responses. For example: ‘I’d like to thank Reviewer 1 for their comments on my work but I disagree for the following reasons’ and then list them, putting your strongest arguments in first place.

Editors are not expecting you to fully agree with all the comments made about your work during peer review, but you must have coherent and strong arguments if you defer. There is nothing to worry about if your arguments are convincing and, hey, if they are not then perhaps the reviewer has a point after all. This is why it’s always important to take a step back, take a deep breath, and be calm when responding to peer review comments: one good tip is to wait for a few days after receiving comments on your work before starting to compose your responses. Let the dust settle.

Our blog series this week has covered the journey taken by a manuscript from submission, through peer review, to eventual acceptance. Our team at Charlesworth Author Services are always available to answer any questions you might have, or to aid you in your writing, editing and peer review journey. Get in touch with us to discover how we can help you!


Share with your colleagues

Related articles

Best tips for becoming a peer reviewer

Open Peer Review: What is it and what are the benefits?

Positive peer review: Some tips and tricks

Rejection at the pre-peer review stage

Recommended webinars

Bitesize Webinar: How to write and structure your academic article for publication - Module 12: Understand the peer review process

Bitesize Webinar: Peer Review: Module 1: Introducing Peer Review

Bitesize Webinar: Peer Review: Module 2: Types of Peer Review

Bitesize Webinar: Peer Review: Module 3: Reviewing Peer Reviewers

Learn more

Bitesize Webinar: Peer Review: Module 4: Dealing with revise and resubmit

Bitesize Webinar: Peer Review: Module 5: Dealing with rejection

How to deal with revise and resubmit to an academic journal

What are the Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review?