Primary literature vs. Secondary literature – and how to reference each
‘Literature’ in science
The word ‘literature’ is often used to refer to compositions of enduring literary value, such as classic novels. In science it means published information or studies about a given topic. Such published information, whether in print or electronic form, comprises articles (research papers) in journals, conference proceedings, whole books or individual chapters in multi-authored volumes, and so on. (Read more about the spectrum of scientific papers here: Different types of scientific papers)
Given the value science places on originality and priority, such literature is categorised as either primary or secondary literature. This article delves into the differences between the two, and also addresses the question of which type of literature is allowed to use which as a reference.
What makes primary literature ‘primary’
Primary literature is literature in which fresh scientific findings are reported for the first time, the most common outlet for such information being a research paper in a journal. This is mostly the case in physical and biological sciences. In the social sciences and in humanities, books are also often used to convey original findings.
Most of the time, the findings that make up primary literature simply strengthen and expand the existing body of science in small increments; completely novel, pathbreaking discoveries are rare. Nevertheless, all these articles make up the body of science and constitute primary literature.
Some examples of very well-known primary literature are:
- Watson and Crick published the chemical structure of DNA for the first time in the journal Nature.
- Decades before them, Mendel published the results of his experiments on breeding peas – observations that revealed the principles of heredity for the first time – in an Austrian journal, where the results lay buried until they were rediscovered.
What makes secondary literature ‘secondary’
Whereas journals are the staple reading for researchers and academics, the wider public learns about the progress of sciences through articles in newspapers, magazines, radio talks and TV shows, blogs and podcasts, and so on. Even scientists learn of developments in fields with which they are not familiar through these channels, which make the secondary literature ‘secondary’ since the content is based on or derived from primary literature, such as the original content published in journals.
Another reason for using the adjective ‘secondary’ is that the content is nearly always written by somebody without first-hand involvement in or knowledge of the subject. For instance, a journalist may interview a scientist who had made a ground-breaking discovery, read up on the subject and then write a magazine article for the general public.
Primary vs. secondary literature: Other differences
The two categories of literature also differ in their purpose and target readership.
- Primary literature is more concerned about establishing authority and novelty – ‘I am the first to find and report this’ – and is meant for other researchers in the same or a similar field. Readers of primary literature are likely to understand the intricacies of that research in more depth and may be more readily poised to challenge any errors in method or logic within that paper.
- Secondary literature, on the other hand, is more about explaining the science to a wider, usually non-specialist, readership: readers who wish to understand rather than challenge.
Referencing primary and secondary literature
Secondary literature may cite primary literature or other sources of secondary literature. However, primary literature never cites secondary literature.
Research papers are the quintessential example of primary literature and the sources that you would cite within research papers must in turn be other primary sources – other research papers, dissertations, books etc.
Consider this simple example.
You may have read a report in a magazine which stated that global daily food consumption per capita, which was 2940 kcal in 2015, is estimated to increase to 3050 kcal in 2030. However, if you wish to cite these figures in a research paper, you cannot cite the magazine as a source. Instead, you should cite the original document or study that reported the numbers for the first time, namely World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective.
Charlesworth Author Services, a trusted brand supporting the world’s leading academic publishers, institutions and authors since 1928.
To know more about our services, visit: Our Services
Visit our new Researcher Education Portal that offers articles and webinars covering all aspects of your research to publication journey! And sign up for our newsletter on the Portal to stay updated on all essential researcher knowledge and information!
Register now: Researcher Education Portal
Maximise your publication success with Charlesworth Author Services.